Skip to main content

Jeopardy! IBM Challenge continues as Watson takes a huge lead

Round two of the Jeopardy! IBM Challenge continued last night as past champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter returned to face off against the trivia-spouting supercomputer, Watson. The first round ended with Rutter and Watson tied at $5,000 and Jennings trailing at $2,000. Last night’s showdown played out very differently as the IBM creation pulled far ahead of its meatbag competitors over the course of the episode.

Despite making a few flubs on key questions, a high bid Daily Double and the Final Jeopardy question in particular, Watson ended the second of three rounds with $35,734, more than triple second-place contender Rutter’s $10,400 and miles ahead of Jennings’ $4800. The human competitors are going to have their work cut out for them in the final faceoff tonight, though looking at Watson’s overall performance in round two, this contest is pretty much over.

Recommended Videos

The supercomputer tripped up a couple of times last night, notably when it bid $6435 on and got the response wrong after misreading the clue. “In May 2010 5 paintings worth $125 million by Braque, Matisse & 3 others left Paris’ museum of this art period,” the clue read. Watson replied “Picasso,” naming one of the three other artists whose paintings were stolen (the other two were Amedeo Modigliani and Fernand Leger) when, of course, the response being sought was the rest of the museum’s name, “Modern Art.”

Twice last night the supercomputer repeated a wrong answer delivered by a quicker-to-the-buzzer competitor. Watson also had trouble in general with the art-related clues. Didn’t Star Trek: The Next Generation‘s android Data struggle with such things as well? Computers and creative thinking clearly do not go well together.

Watson also failed to answer correctly during Final Jeopardy, a clue asking them to name which U.S. city has one airport named after a World War II hero and another named after a World War II battle. “Toronto?????” the computer replied, which isn’t even a U.S. city. It bet only $947 though, which kept the final money tally far ahead of the other two competitors. Tonight’s third and final round will give Jennings and Rutter one last opportunity to gain the upper hand, but for now it’s looking like a victory for the machines of the world.

Adam Rosenberg
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
AMD’s RDNA 4 may surprise us in more ways than one
AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.

Thanks to all the leaks, I thought I knew what to expect with AMD's upcoming RDNA 4. It turns out I may have been wrong on more than one account.

The latest leaks reveal that AMD's upcoming best graphics card may not be called the RX 8800 XT, as most leakers predicted, but will instead be referred to as theĀ  RX 9070 XT. In addition, the first leaked benchmark of the GPU gives us a glimpse into the kind of performance we can expect, which could turn out to be a bit of a letdown.

Read more
This futuristic mechanical keyboard will set you back an eye-watering $1,600
Hands typing on The Icebreaker keyboard.

I've complained plenty about how some of the best gaming keyboards are too expensive, from the Razer Black Widow V4 75% to the Wooting 80HE, but nothing comes remotely close to The Icebreaker. Announced nearly a year ago by Serene Industries, The Icebreaker is unlike any keyboard I've ever seen -- and it's priced accordingly at $1,600. Plus shipping, of course.

What could justify such an extravagant price? Aluminum, it turns out. The keyboard is constructed of one single block of 6061 aluminum in what Serene Industries calls an "unorthodox wedge form." As if that wasn't enough metal, the keycaps are also made of aluminum, and Serene says they include "about 800" micro-perforations that allow the LED backlight of the keyboard to shine through.

Read more
Google one-ups Microsoft by making chats easier to transfer
Google Spaces in Google Chat on a MacBook.

In a recent blog post, Google announced that it is making it easier for admins to migrate from Microsoft TeamsĀ to Google Chat to reduce downtime. Admins can easily do this within the Google Chat migration menu and connect to opposing Microsoft accounts to transfer Teams data.

Google gave step-by-step instructions for admins on how to transfer the messages. Admins need to connect to their Microsoft account and upload a CSV of the Teams from where they transfer the messages. From there, it requires just entering a starting date for messages to be migrated from Teams and clicking Star migration. Once it's complete, it'll make the migrated space, messages, and conversation data available to Google Workspace users.

Read more