Skip to main content

Afraid the FBI is misusing its license plate scanner data? So are its officials

Concerns over the watchful, all-seeing eye of big brother extend beyond just intercepted phone calls and emails: we’re being watched when we drive, too. And while it’s perfectly reasonable to accept that we’re occasionally monitored by patrolling police and traffic cameras, it’s the implementation of license plate scanners that raise significant privacy concerns.

Private citizens raising these questions isn’t anything new, but according Internal FBI documents that have made their way to the American Civil Liberties Union, even officials in the bureau wondered if it’s behaving responsibly with the data.

Recommended Videos

The main concern is that the automatic license plate readers rapidly collect the data of all the drivers in the area. Spread enough of these around, and a fairly clear picture of where drivers spend most of their time is revealed. It’s sort of like following tens of thousands of people at a time and jotting down their whereabouts.

FBI
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The FBI’s Video Surveillance Unit (VSU) lends out its fleet of readers to local field offices for crime investigations, but there’s little regulation as to how the readers are used. While intended to track the behavior of criminal suspects, there’s nothing stopping the FBI from just following down specific groups for the heck of it.

When we say “little regulation,” it’s because we don’t know what the specifics are. The ACLU-acquired documents reveal that the FBI stopped purchasing the plate readers temporarily because its Office of General Counsel was “wrestling with LPR privacy issues.”

The documents reveal that there has since been some regulatory policy in place, but there’s little to no transparency as to what that is. While its good that the Bureau are at least acknowledging the issue, groups like the ACLU feel we should know what the self-governing rules are so we can deem them sufficient, as well as legislate how long the collected data is retained.

Like all the other stories of our digital lives being monitored and tucked away somewhere, this is equally as scary, but its fortunate that groups like the ACLU are here to remind us that our voice determines whether we accept these things or not.

Alexander Kalogianni
Alex K is an automotive writer based in New York. When not at his keyboard or behind the wheel of a car, Alex spends a lot of…
Plug-in hybrids are becoming more popular. Why? And will it continue?
Kia Niro EV Charging Port

There's a lot of talk about the idea that the growth in electric car sales has kind of slowed a little. It's not all that surprising -- EVs are still expensive, early adopters all have one by now, and they're still new enough to where there aren't too many ultra-affordable used EVs available. But plenty of people still want a greener vehicle, and that has given rise to an explosion in hybrid vehicle sales.

That's especially true of plug-in hybrid vehicles, which can be charged like an EV and driven in all-electric mode for short distances, and have a gas engine as a backup for longer distances or to be used in combination with electric mode for more efficient driving.

Read more
EV drivers are not going back to gas cars, global survey says
ev drivers are not going back to gas cars global survey says screenshot

Nearly all current owners of electric vehicles (EVs) are either satisfied or very satisfied with the experience, and 92% of them plan to buy another EV, according to a survey by the Global EV Drivers Alliance.

The survey of 23,000 EV drivers worldwide found that only 1% would return to a petrol or diesel car, while 4% would opt for a plug-in hybrid (PHEV) if they had to replace their car.

Read more
Trump team in sync with Tesla on ending crash-reporting requirements, report says
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The transition team of President-elect Donald Trump is planning to end existing car-crash reporting requirements to safety regulators, according to a Reuters report.

The report cites a document obtained by Reuters that lays out the transition team’s 100-day strategy for automotive policy. In the document, the team says the crash-reporting requirement leads to “excessive” data collection, Reuters says.

Read more