Skip to main content

AMD’s Radeon R9 Nano is built for tiny PCs, but costs as much as the Fury X

After all of the rumors, leaked graphs, and in-hand shots of AMD’s new compact card, we finally have confirmed details from AMD itself. The half-length graphics card sports 4GB of AMD’s High Bandwidth Memory, a variable clock rate, and an efficient 175 target wattage.

Up until now, we’ve essentially just known that the Nano is small, and it sips power, especially when you compare it to the previous generation of Radeon graphics cards. Now we know that the Nano is just six inches long – 40 percent shorter than the 290X. With 4,096 stream processors, it’s also 30 percent faster than the 290X, based on AMD’s testing. Despite that power bump and the smaller footprint, the Nano actually runs at a target temperature of just 75 degrees Celsius, a full 20 degrees cooler than the 290X.

AMD says that’s not a throttling for temperature either. In fact, the card doesn’t throttle until the interior temperature hits 85 degrees. The low power usage and heat is instead an effect of the card’s dynamic engine clock. Although it has a maximum clock speed of 1,000MHz, the chip will actually dynamically fluctuate its speed based on its power requirements in order to find the most efficient point on the curve. That means that not only is the Nano much more power efficient than any previous Radeon card, but is also, as AMD puts it, library quiet.

R9Stack-3
AMD
Recommended Videos

The reason for all of these thermal, power, and noise design innovations isn’t just for bragging rights, though. The R9 Nano is a card built for small systems, providing 4K gaming power to even Mini-ITX motherboards. Such systems tend to have serious limits not only on the space available for components, but also on power and heat inside the case. To top it off, the smaller cases tend to amplify component and fan noise, so the Nano’s quiet demeanor, even with air cooling, is more important than you might think.

And when you compare the R9 Nano to other cards that fit well int he Mini-ITX form factor, the difference becomes even more clear. When you run it up against Nvidia’s GTX 970 mITX, the R9 Nano is 30 percent faster on average when playing games in 4K.

R9Stack-4
AMD

AMD’s pint-sized R9 Nano will be available to the masses on September 10th for the substantial price of $649. Unfortunately, that places the Nano at the same price point as the Fury X, but AMD says that’s missing the point. The card is about 10 percent slower than the Fury X, but the liquid cooled flagship is about maximized performance, whereas the Nano is intended to open up a market that’s never existed before – a top tier miniature graphics cards.

The newest addition to AMD’s new flagship line isn’t going to set any speed records, nor is it trying to be the next budget blockbuster. Instead, the R9 Nano is an enthusiast card for builders looking to change up their routine for their next system. It’s the kind of card that’s more likely to show up in a high end home theater PC or a funky case mod than a full sized tower, but if that’s what AMD is going for, then they nailed it.

R9Stack-Specs
AMD
Brad Bourque
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
AMD’s RDNA 4 may surprise us in more ways than one
AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.

Thanks to all the leaks, I thought I knew what to expect with AMD's upcoming RDNA 4. It turns out I may have been wrong on more than one account.

The latest leaks reveal that AMD's upcoming best graphics card may not be called the RX 8800 XT, as most leakers predicted, but will instead be referred to as theĀ  RX 9070 XT. In addition, the first leaked benchmark of the GPU gives us a glimpse into the kind of performance we can expect, which could turn out to be a bit of a letdown.

Read more
This futuristic mechanical keyboard will set you back an eye-watering $1,600
Hands typing on The Icebreaker keyboard.

I've complained plenty about how some of the best gaming keyboards are too expensive, from the Razer Black Widow V4 75% to the Wooting 80HE, but nothing comes remotely close to The Icebreaker. Announced nearly a year ago by Serene Industries, The Icebreaker is unlike any keyboard I've ever seen -- and it's priced accordingly at $1,600. Plus shipping, of course.

What could justify such an extravagant price? Aluminum, it turns out. The keyboard is constructed of one single block of 6061 aluminum in what Serene Industries calls an "unorthodox wedge form." As if that wasn't enough metal, the keycaps are also made of aluminum, and Serene says they include "about 800" micro-perforations that allow the LED backlight of the keyboard to shine through.

Read more
Google one-ups Microsoft by making chats easier to transfer
Google Spaces in Google Chat on a MacBook.

In a recent blog post, Google announced that it is making it easier for admins to migrate from Microsoft TeamsĀ to Google Chat to reduce downtime. Admins can easily do this within the Google Chat migration menu and connect to opposing Microsoft accounts to transfer Teams data.

Google gave step-by-step instructions for admins on how to transfer the messages. Admins need to connect to their Microsoft account and upload a CSV of the Teams from where they transfer the messages. From there, it requires just entering a starting date for messages to be migrated from Teams and clicking Star migration. Once it's complete, it'll make the migrated space, messages, and conversation data available to Google Workspace users.

Read more