Skip to main content

Don’t get your hopes up for next-gen GPUs just yet

Two RTX 4060 graphics cards stacked on top of each other.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The list of the best graphics cards will probably look a lot different in a month’s time. We’re standing on the edge of the next generation of graphics cards, and it looks like Nvidia, AMD, and Intel all have big plans in store. At least from the conversations I’ve had, all eyes are on what the next generation of graphics cards has to offer before making an upgrade decision.

That’s generally good advice — if new hardware is about to launch, there isn’t much reason to spend up for last-gen components. You’ll likely pay a higher price, and you could be missing out on some big performance gains. This generation, however, it’s important to temper expectations. Although the next generation of graphics cards is exciting, it probably won’t be a reality for most gamers anytime soon.

Recommended Videos

Always start with the flagships

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 GPU.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

We never get a bunch of graphics cards at once. Nvidia and AMD slowly trickle out the cards in a new generation over the course of several months, and that time adds up quickly. To illustrate, here’s a timeline of releases in the past generation:

I haven’t included every GPU released here — particularly cards like the RTX 4070 Super — but this timeline paints a pretty clear picture about how the main stack is spread out. From the release of the RTX 4090 to the release of the RTX 4060 — the latter of which is the second most popular GPU on Steam — more than eight months passed.

AMD had a slightly condensed timeline, but that’s only because it decided to release the budget-focused RX 7600 immediately following its flagship release. For midrange options like the RX 7700 XT, you’re still looking at a nine-month gap. Regardless of the release cadence, it’s going to be a while before we see the full lineup of next-gen graphics cards.

That flies in the face of the traditional advice of “just wait and see” when we’re standing on the edge of a new GPU generation. It makes sense to wait a few weeks if you’re interesting in buying a flagship, but for most people, that advice boils down to waiting more than half a year to see if an upgrade is worth it. By that logic, you’d never upgrade your PC.

Wait, then go

The back of the Intel Arc B580 graphics card.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Don’t misunderstand me — I’m not saying you should run out and buy a new GPU right now. It’s worth waiting to see what the next generation has in store, but that really boils down to features more than it does the hardware itself. Waiting a few weeks can inform your upgrade decision, but it won’t make that decision for you.

The big reason to wait is to see if there are any new features exclusive to the next generation of graphics cards. We saw that this past generation with DLSS 3, which has become a major selling point for Nvidia’s GPUs. If there are some exclusive features — something like, for example, FSR 4 for AMD’s next-gen GPUs — it could be worth holding out for a GPU upgrade.

If there aren’t any new features, or you don’t particularly care about whatever new features there are, waiting doesn’t make a ton of sense. That’s particularly true with the range of the most popular graphics cards people buy — GPUs like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 around $300. There’s a good chance we won’t know how the next-gen versions of these GPUs perform for close to a year. By then, you might even start considering your next next GPU upgrade.

1080p performance for the Intel Arc B580.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

In addition, with all of the focus on the next generation of graphics cards, you could miss out on great options available now and pass up on close to a year of an upgraded PC. No one wants to be in that position. Getting tunnel vision means you can miss out on great releases like the recent Intel Arc B580 that provide excellent performance right now.

Waiting may not get you a substantially better graphics card, either. The RTX 4060 and RX 7600 are prime examples here. The RTX 3060 is slower than the RTX 4060, no doubt, but it still delivered above 60 frames per second (fps) in nearly every game you could throw at it at 1080p by the time the RTX 4060 released. Similarly, the RX 7600 was outmatched by the previous-gen RX 6700 XT, which was available for around the same price at the time.

When a new generation rolls around, it’s easy to get swept up in the hype surrounding the new flagships, especially now, when the going price for a flagship is well above $1,000. Lower down the stack, things generally aren’t as rosy, with new mainstream options vying for a spot among cheaper last-gen options. I suspect the next-gen options in this bracket will follow suit.

Targeting an upgrade

Front of the AMD RX 7600.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

As usual, it’s important to target a GPU upgrade to what you actually need. That will save you the most money and deliver a gaming experience you enjoy. That timeless advice sometimes gets lost when a new generation rolls around, as the hype around shiny new hardware and everything it brings sparks the conversation around what options lower down the stack could offer.

It’s just not worth holding out, particularly if you’ve been sitting on a GPU upgrade for a while. I’m talking about the gamers still rocking a GTX 1650 or GTX 1060, or, lord forbid, an RX 580. A card like the Arc B580 will provide an infinitely better experience, and if you’re willing to shop around, you can even find something like an RTX 3070 for around the $300 mark.

Not only will you be able to drastically improve your gaming experience now but you’ll also be able to save up for your next upgrade — maybe a higher-resolution monitor or a newer CPU. That’s better than sitting on hardware you want to replace just to see what, maybe, you’ll be able to get in the next generation.

So, wait and see what Nvidia, AMD, and Intel have in store next month. I’m just as excited as you are, believe me. But don’t let that cloud an upgrade decision about your PC, particularly if you aren’t among the rare few looking at picking up the latest flagship.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Reviewers hated this AMD GPU. Here’s why I still recommend it
AMD RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT graphics cards.

It's rare that reviewers universally hate a graphics card, but most wouldn't put AMD's RX 7700 XT among the best graphics cards you can buy. As you can read in my own combo review of the RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT, the latter GPU just didn't make sense when it launched more than a year ago. Time has marched on, however, and the RX 7700 XT doesn't get the respect it deserves today.

You probably have a negative assumption about this graphics card, and I wouldn't blame you. Tom's Hardware said the GPU got stuck "between a proverbial rock and hard place," while TechSpot was even more harsh: "Purchasing the Radeon 7700 XT at $450 is ill-advised when the 7800 XT is available, leaving us questioning AMD's rationale behind this launch." User reactions were harsher still.

Read more
It’s finally time to stop ignoring Intel GPUs
Two intel Arc graphics cards on a pink background.

Intel is taking another swing at making it among the best graphics cards with the Arc B580, which is set to launch in a matter of days. It's the first time we're seeing discrete graphics on desktop packing Intel's Battlemage architecture, and it's arriving just weeks before AMD and Nvidia are set to launch new generations.

I'm sure you've heard about Intel's first attempt with discrete GPUs, and all of the problems that ensued. Things have changed quite a bit over the past few years, though. I need to wait until the Arc B580 is here to fully put it through its paces, but based on what Intel has shared so far, it's a card you should definitely keep an eye on.
Fulfilling AMD's role

Read more
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle proves Nvidia wrong about 8GB GPUs
Indiana jones buried in the sand.

Nvidia was wrong, and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is proof of that. Despite being a game that's sponsored by Nvidia due to its use of full ray tracing -- which is said to arrive on December 9 -- multiple of Nvidia's best graphics cards struggle to maintain a playable frame rate in the game, and that largely comes down to VRAM.

Computer Base tested a swath of GPUs in the game across resolutions with the highest graphics preset, and one consistent trend emerged. Any GPUs packing less than 12GB of VRAM couldn't even maintain 30 frames per second (fps) in the game at its highest graphics settings. That led to some wild comparisons as you can see in the chart below. The Intel Arc A770, for example, which is a budget-focused 1080p graphics card, beats the RTX 3080, which was the 4K champion when it launched. Why? The A770 has 16GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3080 has 10GB.

Read more