Skip to main content

Intel CPUs may get even hotter

Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

It seems that Intel’s next-gen CPUs might have a higher maximum temperature than some of the current top processors. According to a leak posted on X (formerly Twitter), Intel is said to be increasing the maximum thermal junction (TJ Max) temperature going forward.

The information comes from Jaykihn, a leaker who often shares information about Intel CPUs. Jaykihn claims that Intel is increasing the TJ Max in its upcoming CPUs, but only in the Arrow Lake and Panther Lake lineups, which are getting bumped up to 105 degrees Celsius. Lunar Lake CPUs are said to retain the 100 degrees Celsius maximum.

Recommended Videos

Panther Lake

PTL-U 4+0+4+4Xe 15W
PTL-H 4+8+4+12Xe 25W
PTL-H 4+8+4+4Xe 25W

PTL-H 12Xe pictured.
Dies 4, 1, and 5 correspond to Compute, PCD, and Graphics (Xe3) respectively.
Other two dies are passive. pic.twitter.com/iiZh5fYDMG

— Jaykihn (@jaykihn0) July 15, 2024

Although the increase might seem subtle, going up from 100 degrees Celsius to 105 degrees Celsius, it’s a pretty big deal — and the result could be a mixed bag.

What’s TJ Max? It’s the maximum temperature at which a processor can safely run before its built-in protection mechanisms begin to interfere. When that temperature threshold is reached, the CPU activates safety mechanisms that throttle performance and lower power consumption, improving tempseratures.

Overheating can lead to system instability, crashes, or frame rate drops, which is why this increase in TJ Max can be a good thing. With a higher TJMax, Intel makes a silent promise that its chips should remain stable even during heavy usage, since they’ll now be running at a higher temperature before needing to scale back.

On the other hand, you could see this as a loss instead of a gain — after all, these CPUs might now run hotter on average just because they can. That’s an even bigger deal for the mobile chips, which have device surface temperatures to worry about.

Then, there’s the question of cooling. Would having a higher TJ Max mean that you could opt for a less impressive cooling solution just because the CPU could handle it? In theory, yes, but no one wants their CPU to run at a constant 105 degrees Clesius unless they’re monitoring these temperatures quite carefully. It’s possible that this higher thermal headroom could backfire for some users.

If the higher maximum temperature applies both to Arrow Lake and to Panther Lake, we’ll see these changes hit the market this year and the next. Panther Lake is the follow-up to the mobile Core Ultra processors from the Lunar Lake range, and Arrow Lake are the desktop CPUs that Intel is said to be launching this year.

Jaykihn also shed some light on the possible specs of Panther Lake-H, Panther Lake-U, and Panther Lake-P processors. They shared an unofficial slide that shows off the architecture in Panther Lake. In addition, Jaykihn claimed that Panther Lake-U (the low-power range to be used in ultrathin laptops) will offer up to four P-cores and four low-power (LP) cores, as well as four Xe3 GPU cores.

The high-performance PTL-H is said to sport up to four P-cores, eight E-cores, four LP-cores, and four Xe3 GPU cores. Meanwhile, PTL-P will bump up the GPU cores to 12 Xe3 cores. The distinction between PLT-P and PTL-H was added by OneRaichu, another frequent leaker in the CPU space.

Intel has been having a pretty rough time with the ongoing Raptor Lake scandal, but the news today may end up being a good thing. We’ll need more information before we can say for sure — and that’s assuming this rumor ends up being true.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more
Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel's default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23's multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it's the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Read more