Skip to main content

Toshiba Kirabook vs. Retina Apple MacBook Pro: Spec showdown

Toshiba-v-Mac
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Make sure to check out our full Toshiba Kirabook Review.

Earlier this week, Toshiba announced its premium Kirabook, a superslim 13-inch Ultrabook crafted with a magnesium alloy chassis and featuring a 2560-by-1440 PixelPure display. This sleek new machine is Toshiba’s stab at the luxury notebook market and, by all accounts, the Kirabook’s design certainly fits the bill. In fact, it looks awfully similar to another premium notebook, the 13-inch Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display. Both machines sport third-generation Intel Core i5 or i7 processors and both feature solid-state hard drives, which are much faster than traditional spinning hard drives but can also drive a laptop’s price northward. 

Recommended Videos

Toshiba told us to think of the Kirabook like a MacBook Air with Retina MacBook Pro specs. Pitting the Kirabook against the Retina MacBook Pro made us wonder: how do these two systems compare? We breakdown the highest configurations of both notebooks below. 

 

Toshiba Kirabook

toshiba-kirabook-chart_dt
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Retina MacBook Pro

macbook_dt
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Dimensions 12.44” x 8.15” x 0.70” 12.35″ x 8.62″ x 0.75″
Weight 2.9 pounds 3.57 pounds
Chassis AZ91 pressed magnesium alloy Aluminum
Keyboard Backlit Backlit w/ ambient light sensor
Processor 3.1 GHz Intel Core i7-3537U 3.0 GHz Core i7
RAM 8GB 8GB
Screen Size 13.3″ touchscreen 13.3″ (non touch)
Resolution 2560 x 1440 2560 x 1600
Storage 256GB SSD 256GB SSD
Networking Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0 Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0
Ports HDMI, 3 USB 3.0, memory card reader HDMI, 2 Thunderbolt,
2 USB 3.0, SDXC card reader
Webcam HD webcam 720p HD webcam
Operating System Windows 8 Mac OS X 10.8
Battery Life 6 hours 7 hours
Price $1,999 $1,899

As you can see, both notebooks are about the same size, but you’ll definitely notice a difference when you pick them up. The Kirabook is nearly half a pound lighter – with a touchscreen – than the Retina MacBook Pro. If you opt-out of the Kirabook’s touchscreen, the weight drops to 2.6 pounds. Toshiba says the Kirabook’s magnesium alloy chassis is 10 percent stronger than the aluminum used in the MacBook Pro. Plus, on the inside of the notebook, the chassis has a honeycomb pattern for additional strength and rigidity. 

In terms of specs, the Retina MacBook Pro and the Kirabook are closely matched. We compared the top-of-the-line processors available, which is an Intel Core i7. Both feature the same amount of RAM, a 256GB solid-state drive, and both have an integrated graphics chip. When it comes to ports, the Kirabook wins with three USB 3.0 ports, but the Retina MacBook Pro has two Thunderbolt ports in addition to two USB 3.0s. While we haven’t had a chance to fully review the Kirabook yet, we suspect its six-hour battery life rating may be its Achilles’ heel. If that time drops considerably when using the touchscreen, the Kirabook’s lightweight portability will be dampened by having to tote around a charger on long days. 

Neither the Kirabook nor the Retina MacBook Pro are what you would call “budget buys.” At close to $2,000 for the most powerful configurations, these notebooks are aimed at the luxury and power-user market. We already know that the Retina MacBook Pro can hold its own on benchmarks and real world tests. Unfortunately, we won’t know how powerful the Kirabook is until we’re able to fully review it and put it through its paces.

As the first Windows 8 Ultrabook with a 2560 x 144o touchscreen display, the spec’d out Kirabook is certainly intriguing, though at $100 more than the top-of-the-line 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro, being first doesn’t come cheap. Do you think the luxury-minded Kirabook is worth the premium? 

Meghan McDonough
Contributor
Meghan J. McDonough is a Chicago-based purveyor of consumer technology and music. She previously wrote for LAPTOP Magazine…
Apple’s next Pro Display XDR may use this high-end TV tech
Apple Pro Display XDR WWDC 2019 Hands On

CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants Ross Young recently revealed that Apple's M4 MacBook Pros are using quantum dot technology for the first time -- and now he's predicting that the Pro Display XDR 2 will use it too.

Apple didn't announce the switch from KSF to quantum dot itself, but the expert consultant firm confirmed the change by using a spectrometer on the new M4 MacBook Pro.

Read more
MacBook Pro 16 vs. MacBook Pro 14: here’s which M4 you should buy
The MacBook Pro 16-inch on a table.

MacBook Pros are some of the best laptops money can buy. With the M4 chip now onboard, these laptops have never been so powerful, and the update brings some interesting upgrades, such as the improved 12-megapixel webcam and brighter screen. They're the best MacBooks that have ever been made, and it's a perfect time to pick one up based on upgrade timing.

But just because the entire MacBook Pro lineup is better now, that doesn't mean it's any easier to choose between the two size options that are available. Despite the fact that they include many of the same features, the 14-inch MacBook Pro and 16-inch MacBook Pro feel like entirely different systems due to their contrast in size.

Read more
Apple hid one of the best features of the M4 MacBook Pro
Someone using a MacBook Pro M4.

Apple's new M4 MacBook Pro is great. It earned a rare Editors' Choice badge in our M4 MacBook Pro review, and it's cemented itself as one of the best laptops you can buy. Even with so much going for it, Apple hid one of the most exciting developments it made with its new range of laptops -- the use of quantum dot technology.

Like the last few generations of MacBook Pro displays, the M4 range is using a mini-LED backlight. There's no tandem OLED like we saw on the iPad Pro earlier this year. However, according to Ross Young, CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), Apple added a layer of quantum dots to the M4 MacBook Pro. This, according to the display expert, offers better color gamut and motion performance compared to the solution Apple previously used.

Read more