Skip to main content

Pay TV is dying, and cable providers are happily hastening its demise

The number of households in the U.S. that have a traditional, paid television subscription is plummeting, but TV providers don’t seem to mind — in fact, a recent report suggests that they’re partly to blame.

According to market research firm eMarketer, more than 25% of U.S. households will be cord cutters by 2023, with the number of traditional, bundled TV plans declining 4.2% this year and continuing at a steady, negative rate of growth going forward. At that rate, the number of households with traditional pay-TV plans will rapidly approach the number of households that either never had a bundled TV subscription or cancel theirs in the years to come.

This aggressive decline in bundled TV subscribers is reportedly a self-inflicted wound, though, with many cable and satellite providers opting to prioritize per-customer profit over a wider revenue stream.

With the costs of maintaining and licensing large bundles of programming on the rise, TV providers are increasing prices for bundled TV plans to the point of pushing away subscribers — only to have those subscribers pivot to the company’s similarly expensive, but significantly more profitable broadband internet service.

LG 75-inch 4K TV
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This shift has developed in concert with the rapid rise of various direct-to-consumer video services such as Netflix, CBS All Access, and the upcoming Disney+ platform, which allow content creators to reach — and continue to earn revenue from — former bundled-TV subscribers.

As the media landscape grows increasingly more consolidated, however, this has also allowed some media companies that encompass both the creation of content and its distribution channels — such as broadband internet providers — to double-dip into their audiences’ wallets. The greater profit margin from this type of arrangement makes it easy to understand why TV providers are more than happy to see subscribers cut the cord on their cable TV plans in favor of a more expensive internet-only package.

Whether such a strategy is sustainable, though, remains to be seen.

At the current rate, the number of U.S. households subscribing to traditional, bundled programming plans from cable or satellite TV companies will drop below 80 million by 2021. The cost of internet plans and existing streaming video services continues to rise, though, along with the number of new direct-to-consumer video services expected to launch between now and then.

The trends suggest that the streaming wars might not be limited to competing services like Netflix and Disney+, but will also pit audiences against the massive media companies that create and deliver their favorite shows.

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
Netflix’s hit series Arcane is TV’s best Game of Thrones successor
Jinx wears a hood in Arcane season 2.

Ever since Game of Thrones ended, Hollywood's biggest streamers and TV networks have worked hard to try and replicate its success. Studios like Netflix and Amazon have invested huge loads of money into high-profile fantasy shows like The Witcher, The Wheel of Time, and The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, while HBO has attempted to keep the Thrones train going with a prequel series, House of the Dragon, and multiple other in-development spinoffs as well.

Try as they might, though, none of these series have been able to successfully recreate the same alchemy of violence, character development, fantasy worldbuilding, and moment-to-moment unpredictability that made Thrones not only so watchable, but downright addictive. The only show that has come even remotely close to doing that is — shockingly enough — Arcane.

Read more
The Penguin saved its best surprise for last
Colin Farrell sits in a chair in The Penguin.

Warning: This article contains major spoilers for The Penguin (2024).

There is an inherent danger in making a show like The Penguin. The series has to humanize a despicable villain, Oz Cobb (Colin Farrell), and make him a character that viewers want to follow for eight hours. At the same time, it has to make sure not to humanize him so much that it ends up removing the character's villainous edge. That's a balance that certain superhero movies and TV shows have struggled to strike over the years.

Read more