Skip to main content

Apple CEO Tim Cook opens dialogue with the public, as victims’ families speak out

The Apple vs. FBI case is really heating up, and Apple CEO Tim Cook has opened up a dialogue with employees and customers in an effort to help the public understand why Apple refuses to help the FBI crack into a terrorist’s iPhone.

Cook made plain his displeasure with the government in a public email to employees requesting “the government to withdraw its demands.” In the email titled, “Thank you for your support” Cook noted that he sincerely believes the best solution is a proactive one, and that the U.S. government should create a commission to further discuss and reckon with the issue between law enforcement’s access to technology and American civil liberties:

Recommended Videos

“Our country has always been strongest when we come together. We feel the best way forward would be for the government to withdraw its demands under the All Writs Act and, as some in Congress have proposed, form a commission or other panel of experts on intelligence, technology and civil liberties to discuss the implications for law enforcement, national security, privacy and personal freedoms. Apple would gladly participate in such an effort.”

Apple also launched a new webpage explaining the entire issue, including an FAQ. Apple clarifies that it will not willingly create anything for the FBI akin to a “master key” that can be used to access any iPhone, even if it’s only used on a single device, as it will likely never remain safe.

“The only way to guarantee that such a powerful tool isn’t abused and doesn’t fall into the wrong hands is to never create it.”

Apple says, “we’ve handed over all the data we have, including a backup of the iPhone in question. But now they have asked us for information we simply do not have.” This is just the beginning. The FBI and Justice Department continue to press Apple to enable the FBI direct access of some kind to Farook’s iPhone.

Meanwhile, families who lost loved ones in San Bernardino are finally speaking out regarding the battle of encryption between Apple and the FBI. Reuters reported that they filed a legal brief by early March in support of the FBI’s effort to force Apple to unlock Farook’s iPhone.

The group’s attorney, Stephen Larson, said the victims “were targeted by terrorists, and they need to know why, how this could happen.”

It’s very possible this support could prove to be a strong ally for the federal government, who is likely to push this fight to the Supreme Court if it has to. Larson, who used to be a federal judge, is representing the case for free.

However, not all victims of the San Bernardino terrorist attack are in support of the FBI. Carole Adams, who tragically lost her son, Robert Adams, at the hands of Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife is in full support of Apple.

“This is what separates us from communism, isn’t it? The fact we have the right to privacy,” Adams said in an interview with the New York Post on Feb 18. “I think Apple is definitely within their rights to protect the privacy of all Americans.”

She continued, “This is what makes America great to begin with, that we abide by a constitution that gives us the right of privacy, the right to bear arms, and the right to vote.”

Adams made it clear that getting into Farook’s iPhone is important, but she thinks it needs to be done without putting others at risk.

Robert Nazarian
Robert Nazarian became a technology enthusiast when his parents bought him a Radio Shack TRS-80 Color. Now his biggest…
Cost-cutting strips Pixel 9a of the best Gemini AI features in Pixel 9
Person holds Pixel 9a in hand while sitting in a car.

The Pixel 9a has been officially revealed, and while it's an eye candy, there are some visible cutbacks over the more premium Pixel 9 and 9 Pro series phones. The other cutbacks we don't see include lower RAM than the Pixel 9 phones, which can limit the new mid-ranger's ability to run AI applications, despite running the same Tensor G4 chipset.

Google's decision to limit the RAM to 8GB, compared to the 12GB on the more premium Pixel 9 phones, sacrifices its ability to run certain AI tasks locally. ArsTechnica has reported that as a result of the cost-cutting, Pixel 9a runs an "extra extra small" or XXS variant -- instead of the "extra small" variant on Pixel 9 -- of the Gemini Nano 1.0 model that drives on-device AI functions.

Read more
Does the Google Pixel 9a come with a charger? Here’s what’s in the box
A woman holding a purple Google Pixel 9a.

After much speculation in recent months, the Google Pixel 9a has finally been announced. Google's Pixel A series is an excellent choice for those seeking a reliable Android smartphone at a lower price point, and the latest model follows this trend. While it is undeniably part of the Google Pixel 9 series, it has fewer features than its higher-end counterparts.

One question you might have when considering the Pixel 9a is whether it comes with a charger. We’ve got the answer
The Pixel 9a does not come with a charger.
The short answer is that the Pixel 9a does not have a charger. This has become common practice for most smartphones today, including other models in the Pixel 9 series, like the Pixel 9 Pro. While this may be disappointing, it's not surprising.

Read more
Google Pixel 9a vs. Pixel 8a: should you upgrade?
Google Pixel 9a vs Pixel 8a.

Google has released a new budget phone, the Pixel 9a. How does it compare to its predecessor, the Pixel 8a? We've got the answers, and the changes are significant in some ways. In others, not so much. If you have a Pixel 8a and are considering upgrading, read this first.
Google Pixel 9a: vs. Google Pixel 8a: specs

Google Pixel 9a
Google Pixel 8a

Read more