Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

BlackBerry is better off dead

I haven’t seen anyone use a BlackBerry since my freshman year of high school. In fact, I thought the BlackBerry had already died by the time everyone got their hands on the iPhone and/or an Android smartphone in 2011 and I was shocked to learn that the minuscule PDA-like device was still around last month when the company that shares its name decommissioned calling and messaging services for the classic models and rendered them useless. Its death was confirmed when OnwardMobility lost the rights to the BlackBerry name despite its attempts to resurrect the brand with the BlackBerry 5G, which suffered multiple delays in 2021.

Despite being one of the most popular mobile devices in the 2000s next to the T-Mobile-exclusive Sidekick, BlackBerry didn’t survive the smartphone era, even though it triggered the advent of smartphones starting with the iPhone. Given its PDA-esque design, it wasn’t suitable enough to be turned into a smartphone — or, at the very least, the culturally accepted definition of a smartphone: All touchscreen, no physical QWERTY keyboard. Because of its failure to adapt to the growing smartphone market dominated solely by touchscreens, not to mention the lack of updates for the newer, surviving models — like the BlackBerry Key2 — the BlackBerry as a device is better off dead for all intents and purposes.

The rise and fall of the BlackBerry

Recommended Videos

The BlackBerry was born as a two-way pager in 1996, created by Research In Motion (RIM) on a contract with Canadian telecommunications company Rogers. It was designed to send emails and other messages wirelessly, which was considered an innovation at the time. In 2002, the BlackBerry evolved from a pager to a cellphone, adding a keyboard to boot. Over the next few years, RIM gradually added more features to make it look like cellphones from its rivals, such as a color display, Wi-Fi, and a built-in camera. But it still looked so much like a PDA that it appealed more to business professionals and other wealthy people than those in lower-income brackets, making it a status symbol.

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

By 2007, BlackBerry extended its reach from business professionals and other privileged people (even then-President Barack Obama) to high school students, giving everybody the ability to do things they normally needed a computer to do, such as answering emails and surfing the internet. Aside from MySpace and Facebook, social media wasn’t around at that time, but people were so hooked on the idea of being connected 24/7 through their BlackBerry — especially with its Instant Messaging feature, called BlackBerry Messenger — that the phone earned the nickname “CrackBerry.”

That addiction drove the phone’s profits through the roof, grossing RIM over $3 billion in revenue with a net income of over $631 million. By the end of the decade, BlackBerry dominated 43% of the smartphone market in the U.S., with 20% on the global scale, and selling over 50 million BlackBerries a year, according to The Guardian.

When Apple came out with the iPhone, it started to make a run for BlackBerry’s money. Although businesspeople remained loyal to the keyboard-laden phone, the BlackBerry eventually went out of style due to its struggle to compete with the uber-popular iPhone and Android touchscreen smartphones.

Failed touchscreen experiments

BlackBerry Key2 seen from the front.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

In 2008, in an effort to keep up with the ever-changing mobile industry, RIM released its very first touchscreen phone called the BlackBerry Storm. According to the 2015 book Losing the Signal: The Untold Story Behind the Extraordinary Rise and Spectacular Fall of Blackberry (via BGR), the Storm sold well at first because the BlackBerry brand was still strong enough and Verizon developed a heavy marketing campaign to counter the then-AT&T exclusive iPhone. But things quickly cratered once people started using the phone. John Stratton, then Verizon’s chief marketing officer, told RIM’s then-CEO Jim Balsillie that “every one of the 1 million Storm phones … needed replacing,” but the replacements were being returned just as fast. The Storm turned out to be a disaster because its performance was sluggish and it was riddled with bugs — so much so that Stratton wanted RIM to pay Verizon nearly $500 million to cover its losses.

Three years later, RIM developed its first mini-tablet, called the BlackBerry Playbook. However, the tablet was missing the email app, which made it completely useless in the eyes of business-minded customers.

In 2013, after RIM changed its name to BlackBerry, it finally pulled itself together and released the all-touchscreen BlackBerry 10. Unfortunately, it came at the worst possible time. The iPhone and Android touchscreen phones had taken over so much of the smartphone market that BlackBerry’s global market share plummeted to less than 1% by 2017.

Slow and steady loses the race

OnwardMobility’s attempt to bring the BlackBerry back from the dead is a nice gesture from a nostalgic lens. Unfortunately, its efforts to do so proved to be futile. BlackBerry may have been the king of the smartphone industry in the early aughts, but it could never catch up to Android and Apple smartphones. When the company finally eliminated the physical keyboard on the BlackBerry 10, the mobile industry and its consumers were already deeply in love with their iPhones and Samsung Galaxy smartphones. It was just too little, too late.

“Slow and steady wins the race” may have been the moral of The Tortoise and the Hare, but in the case of BlackBerry and its reluctance to create a full-touchscreen BlackBerry phone, slow and steady loses the race. Therefore, BlackBerry should stay dead.

Cristina Alexander
Former Gaming/Mobile Writer
Cristina Alexander is a gaming and mobile writer at Digital Trends. She blends fair coverage of games industry topics that…
Topics
Cost-cutting strips Pixel 9a of the best Gemini AI features in Pixel 9
Person holds Pixel 9a in hand while sitting in a car.

The Pixel 9a has been officially revealed, and while it's an eye candy, there are some visible cutbacks over the more premium Pixel 9 and 9 Pro series phones. The other cutbacks we don't see include lower RAM than the Pixel 9 phones, which can limit the new mid-ranger's ability to run AI applications, despite running the same Tensor G4 chipset.

Google's decision to limit the RAM to 8GB, compared to the 12GB on the more premium Pixel 9 phones, sacrifices its ability to run certain AI tasks locally. ArsTechnica has reported that as a result of the cost-cutting, Pixel 9a runs an "extra extra small" or XXS variant -- instead of the "extra small" variant on Pixel 9 -- of the Gemini Nano 1.0 model that drives on-device AI functions.

Read more
Does the Google Pixel 9a come with a charger? Here’s what’s in the box
A woman holding a purple Google Pixel 9a.

After much speculation in recent months, the Google Pixel 9a has finally been announced. Google's Pixel A series is an excellent choice for those seeking a reliable Android smartphone at a lower price point, and the latest model follows this trend. While it is undeniably part of the Google Pixel 9 series, it has fewer features than its higher-end counterparts.

One question you might have when considering the Pixel 9a is whether it comes with a charger. We’ve got the answer
The Pixel 9a does not come with a charger.
The short answer is that the Pixel 9a does not have a charger. This has become common practice for most smartphones today, including other models in the Pixel 9 series, like the Pixel 9 Pro. While this may be disappointing, it's not surprising.

Read more
Google Pixel 9a vs. Pixel 8a: should you upgrade?
Google Pixel 9a vs Pixel 8a.

Google has released a new budget phone, the Pixel 9a. How does it compare to its predecessor, the Pixel 8a? We've got the answers, and the changes are significant in some ways. In others, not so much. If you have a Pixel 8a and are considering upgrading, read this first.
Google Pixel 9a: vs. Google Pixel 8a: specs

Google Pixel 9a
Google Pixel 8a

Read more