Skip to main content

Facebook to pay a historic $5 billion penalty in final settlement with FTC

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has officially penalized Facebook a groundbreaking $5 billion over privacy violations, the largest fine in FTC history. 

According to a Wednesday press release from the FTC, the social network giant will also have to submit to new restrictions, as well as a modified corporate structure that will hold the company accountable for decisions made about users’ privacy. 

Recommended Videos

“Despite repeated promises to its billions of users worldwide that they could control how their personal information is shared, Facebook undermined consumers’ choices,” said FTC Chairman Joe Simons in the press release. “The magnitude of the $5 billion penalty and sweeping conduct relief are unprecedented in the history of the FTC. The relief is designed not only to punish future violations but, more importantly, to change Facebook’s entire privacy culture to decrease the likelihood of continued violations. The Commission takes consumer privacy seriously, and will enforce FTC orders to the fullest extent of the law.”

Additionally, the order imposes further privacy requirements. These include greater oversight over third-party apps, prohibiting the use of telephone numbers to enable a security feature,  providing clear and conspicuous notice of the use of facial recognition and user consent for this feature, the establishment of a data security program, prohibiting the company from asking for email passwords from new users to other services, and encryption of passwords. 

These requirements also apply to current and future Facebook-owned companies, including Instagram and WhatsApp.

In a Facebook post, CEO Mark Zuckerberg spun the settlement as bringing “major structural changes” to the company.

“We expect it will take hundreds of engineers and more than a thousand people across our company to do this important work. And we expect it will take longer to build new products following this process going forward,” Zuckerberg said in the post.

Zuckerberg later told employees that Facebook would “change the way that we operate across the whole company, from the leadership down and the ground up. We’re going to change how we build products. And if we don’t, then we’re going to be held accountable for it.”

Facebook also put out a press release on the settlement, spinning the settlement and changes to their policy as their choice, even though both were imposed on it by the FTC.

“The accountability required by this agreement surpasses current US law and we hope will be a model for the industry,” Facebook wrote in the statement.

This settlement is a result of violations Facebook made from a previous settlement with the FTC in 2012. Among these violations, the FTC alleges that Facebook shared user data with third-party app developers, misrepresented users’ ability to control the use of facial recognition and used deceptive practices when collecting users phone numbers for a security feature, which includes advertising purposes. 

“For most Facebook users, their data privacy was not set by their own choices, but by the choices of their most click-happy friends,” said Gustav Eyler, Director of Civil Division Consumer Protection at the Department of Justice during a press conference at the FTC Wednesday morning.

Facebook will be required to designate compliance officers who will be responsible for the new privacy program. The social network will also have to implement an independent privacy committee of Facebook’s board of directors, which will be charged with creating greater accountability. These new compliance officers will create quarterly reports which will be shared with Zuckerberg and the FTC. 

The FTC was divided on the settlement. The 3-2 vote went along party lines, with the pair of Democratic commissioners voting against it. One of them, Commissioner Rohit Chopra, tweeted that the agreement “sets a terrible precedent” because it doesn’t hold Zuckerberg, COO Sheryl Sandberg, or other top executives accountable for privacy violations.

2. Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, and other executives get blanket immunity for their role in the violations. This is wrong and sets a terrible precedent. The law doesn’t give them a special exemption.

— Rohit Chopra (@chopracfpb) July 24, 2019

The settlement is almost 20 times greater than the world’s largest privacy/data security penalty to date. According to the press release, the second-highest penalty in privacy enforcement actions was issued in the case of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and States v. Equifax, which was $275 million.

That said, it’s a drop in the bucket for Facebook, which made $55 billion in revenue in 2018. The $5 billion fine is only 9% of that 2018 revenue. Facebook is also expected to release sky-high quarterly results on Wednesday. According to CNBC, Facebook stock has increased 54% this year. 

Digital Trends reached out to Facebook for comment, but has yet to receive a response. 

Allison Matyus
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Gemini brings a fantastic PDF superpower to Files by Google app
step of Gemini processing a PDF in Files by Google app.

Google is on a quest to push its Gemini AI chatbot in as many productivity tools as possible. The latest app to get some generative AI lift is the Files by Google app, which now automatically pulls up Gemini analysis when you open a PDF document.

The feature, which was first shared on the r/Android Reddit community, is now live for phones running Android 15. Digital Trends tested this feature on a Pixel 9 running the stable build of Android 15 and the latest version of Google’s file manager app.

Read more
Disney co-chairman reveals why The Acolyte was canceled after one season
Sol wields his lightsaber in The Acolyte episode 8.

Lucasfilm may be in the midst of experiencing a wave of positive attention and success thanks to its latest TV series, Skeleton Crew, but the Jude Law-starring sci-fi show isn't the only Star Wars title that has premiered on Disney+ this year. This past summer, Lucasfilm also debuted The Acolyte, a Sith-centric show set around 100 years before the events of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace. Across its eight episodes, the series proved to be critically divisive, and it was only a month after The Acolyte's finale aired that Disney and Lucasfilm announced they would not be bringing the show back for a second season.

In a recent interview with Vulture, Disney Entertainment co-chairman Alan Bergman shed some light on the behind-the-scenes decision to cancel The Acolyte after just one season. "As it relates to Acolyte, we were happy with our performance, but it wasn’t where we needed it to be given the cost structure of that title, quite frankly, to go and make a season 2," Bergman revealed. "That’s the reason why we didn’t do that."

Read more
James Gunn calls Creature Commandos episode the saddest thing he’s ever written
james gunn calls creature commandos weasel episode saddest thing ever written sits at the bottom of a staircase in

Creature Commandos has been splitting its time as of late between the past and present. Its recent episodes have both propelled the show's present-day plot forward and also explored the pasts of characters like The Bride (Indira Varma) and G.I. Robot (Sean Gunn), offering new insights into the tragic events that shaped their identities and led them to their current circumstances. Creature Commandos' fourth and most recent episode, Chasing Squirrels, does the same for Weasel (also Sean Gunn), revealing the horrifying reasons the character was incorrectly blamed for the deaths of multiple schoolchildren.

The episode refrains from explaining what Weasel is or how the character came to be, but it doesn't shy away from the gruesome and tragic details of the "crime" that turned him into a full-blown monster in society's eyes. In an interview with Variety, Creature Commandos creator and DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn reflected on the episode, which is emotionally and narratively dark, even by the Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 filmmaker's standards.

Read more