Skip to main content

Google’s coronavirus screening website accused of mining health data for profit

 

Project Baseline, a pilot site set up by Google parent company Alphabet to give people access to COVID-19 testing sites, is seemingly collecting patient information and selling it for profit, according to new allegations.

Recommended Videos

Dr. Eugene Gu, a popular medical figure on Twitter, drew attention to Project Baseline’s terms of service, which seems to allow it to harvest medical data from people “for commercial purposes.” The site’s privacy policy says personal data “may be used for a variety of purposes,” including “commercial product research and development.”

Google’s Project Baseline coronavirus screening website appears to be one huge data mining operation to collect your health information for commercial purposes. It does not appear to follow HIPAA privacy laws. No wonder Trump was pushing this so hard. This is dystopian. pic.twitter.com/qPafFsd5BZ

— Eugene Gu, MD (@eugenegu) March 16, 2020

Project Baseline launched its COVID-19 site the evening of March 15 as an online tool to find screening areas for people who want to know if they have the coronavirus.

The site is run by Verily, an Alphabet subsidiary and sister site to Google. The testing is currently open only to people in Northern California, and was already fully booked by Tuesday morning, according to the New York Post.

But it also seems that any data a person seeking a test submits to the site could be shared with “biopharma companies and medical device companies” for commercial purposes. Verily says it does not abide by HIPAA privacy regulations in its Terms of Service. HIPAA, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, protects patient privacy in the U.S. Project Baseline’s FAQ, however, says the site itself will abide by it.

The website also requires use of a Google account or creation of a Google email address in order to sign up for a test.

Google Verily coronavirus testing website
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“The coronavirus pandemic is a time of emergency where we all must make sacrifices to help one another,” Wu wrote on Twitter. “Huge corporations using this moment as an opportunity to collect all of our health data for profit is unconscionable. Getting taxpayer money from Trump to do this is even worse.”

“We’re disappointed, but not altogether surprised Google is finding a way to leverage a global health crisis to mine valuable user data,” said Jo O’Reilly, Digital Privacy Advocate at the U.K.-based ProPrivacy, in a statement to Digital Trends. “In times of uncertainty, it can be easy for data privacy to fall by the wayside, but medical data is the most private, and valuable, personal information there is, and this is simply not good enough from Google.”

Google and Verily have not yet responded to requests for comment, but we will update this story when we hear back.

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
Gemini brings a fantastic PDF superpower to Files by Google app
step of Gemini processing a PDF in Files by Google app.

Google is on a quest to push its Gemini AI chatbot in as many productivity tools as possible. The latest app to get some generative AI lift is the Files by Google app, which now automatically pulls up Gemini analysis when you open a PDF document.

The feature, which was first shared on the r/Android Reddit community, is now live for phones running Android 15. Digital Trends tested this feature on a Pixel 9 running the stable build of Android 15 and the latest version of Google’s file manager app.

Read more
Disney co-chairman reveals why The Acolyte was canceled after one season
Sol wields his lightsaber in The Acolyte episode 8.

Lucasfilm may be in the midst of experiencing a wave of positive attention and success thanks to its latest TV series, Skeleton Crew, but the Jude Law-starring sci-fi show isn't the only Star Wars title that has premiered on Disney+ this year. This past summer, Lucasfilm also debuted The Acolyte, a Sith-centric show set around 100 years before the events of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace. Across its eight episodes, the series proved to be critically divisive, and it was only a month after The Acolyte's finale aired that Disney and Lucasfilm announced they would not be bringing the show back for a second season.

In a recent interview with Vulture, Disney Entertainment co-chairman Alan Bergman shed some light on the behind-the-scenes decision to cancel The Acolyte after just one season. "As it relates to Acolyte, we were happy with our performance, but it wasn’t where we needed it to be given the cost structure of that title, quite frankly, to go and make a season 2," Bergman revealed. "That’s the reason why we didn’t do that."

Read more
James Gunn calls Creature Commandos episode the saddest thing he’s ever written
james gunn calls creature commandos weasel episode saddest thing ever written sits at the bottom of a staircase in

Creature Commandos has been splitting its time as of late between the past and present. Its recent episodes have both propelled the show's present-day plot forward and also explored the pasts of characters like The Bride (Indira Varma) and G.I. Robot (Sean Gunn), offering new insights into the tragic events that shaped their identities and led them to their current circumstances. Creature Commandos' fourth and most recent episode, Chasing Squirrels, does the same for Weasel (also Sean Gunn), revealing the horrifying reasons the character was incorrectly blamed for the deaths of multiple schoolchildren.

The episode refrains from explaining what Weasel is or how the character came to be, but it doesn't shy away from the gruesome and tragic details of the "crime" that turned him into a full-blown monster in society's eyes. In an interview with Variety, Creature Commandos creator and DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn reflected on the episode, which is emotionally and narratively dark, even by the Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 filmmaker's standards.

Read more